Gigabit is not enough

Submitted by fredrik.nyman on Mon, 05/13/2019 - 11:16
Image removed.

The Amsterdam Internet Exchange point has been around for a long time and is one of the largest exchange points in the world. Traffic between Internet Service Providers pass over the AMX-IX. Total average bandwidth has been documented since 2002 according and according to Wikipedia the volume has gone from 12Gbit/s in 2002 to 5500Gbit/s in 2017. That averages a 55% growth per year in actual traffic. While the growth rate in the past few years "only" has been in the 25-30% range per year it is still growing significantly. The Netherlands, together with Scandinavia, is one of the most evolved FTTH markets.

The Brazilian Internet Exchange point has only data publicly available dating back to 2012, but since then they have had an annual growth in traffic rate of about 68% per year. Brazil is an emerging FTTx market. Bandwidth growth in the 50%+ range is not just a European phenomenon.

Researcher Jacob Nielsen stipulated Nielsen's law back in 1998.

Basically, Nielsen states that a high-end user's connection speed grows by 50% per year. Taking his own connection as an example he could verify this statement from 1984 and 300bps dial-up modem to today's (last entry from 2018) high-speed connections. His most recent diagram predicts that soon 1Gbit/s will not be sufficient for his own needs and nor will it for many other power users.

Image removed.

Source: Jacob Nielsen

A study made by the Fibre to the home Council a few years ago also confirmed Nielsens statement. The bandwidth rates available on the market tend to grow at about 50% per year. The bandwidth growth of the Internet Exchange points mention above seem to also be well in line with this prediction.

What Nielsen also concludes is that the vast mass of users lags 2-3 years behind the power users. This gives FTTH operators a planning horizon. What is sold today as premium services to a few users will be mass-market services in 2-3 years. If your premium today is 500Mbit/s then build your network to handle these service rates for the bulk of your users in three years time.

Looking at the Scandinavian markets which for long have been leading in fiber based broadband services and penetration, the majority of ports deployed for the past four or five years have been 1Gbit/s symmetrical. Service rates have increased and the most popular services today are 100Mbit/s+ with 250Mbit/s taking on a lot of subscriptions lately. Swedish ISP Bahnhof has even launched a 10Gbit/s service for those willing to pay, which I would say that power users are.

The increase in available bandwidth for users in the Scandinavian market has of course enabled more and new services. Obviously HD-TV and other bandwidth craving services has benefited from this evolution, but not everything is about the average bit-rate you consume but rather the latency in the interaction with the service you use over the connection.

For example, to really make use of a cloud based file storage you need a lot of bandwidth when you want to retrieve or upload the file. Its not that you need a high speed service because you are constantly transferring lots of files. You need a high speed service so that when you do upload or download a file, it is superfast. Only then that cloud storage becomes a viable option to your hard drive, and only then you can start using cool services that can handle and process your image library or use web-applications for IoT control of your home and so on.

Time is also money, and I think all of us value our time more than spending it on waiting for a transfer to complete. High bitrate means faster transfer times even if your files are not gigabytes in size.

Now that Germany, Austria, Italy and Great Britain among other nations are gaining momentum in FTTH deployment, they can benefit from the pioneering countries where widespread FTTH has created a market for bandwidth intense services and functions .

Just remember, soon gigabit is not enough!

Blog posts

Detecting service quality issues

Submitted by fredrik.nyman on Tue, 03/24/2020 - 15:31

While networks handles the increased load from Corona with ease, not all services can say the same. Detecting quality issues in service delivery is much more difficult than checking if the network itself can handle the load. There is probably a million reasons why service quality can degrade even if the network seems to be working fine. The trick to detecting and troubleshooting these situations is use of telemetry and service assurance.

European networks unvoluntary casulties of US-China trade-war

Submitted by fredrik.nyman on Mon, 09/02/2019 - 13:19

I usually don't comment on our competition but recent events such as new legislation proposal from the government in Sweden has sparked a well-needed debate. I commented on the situation for Swedish city networks last week in this IDG article and also wrote a debat

Turn on automation of your FTTH network

Submitted by fredrik.nyman on Mon, 04/01/2019 - 09:08

The distributed nature of a fiber to the home network means that you will have equipment spread out and you might not always do the on-site installation yourself. If every switch has to pass your desk for pre-configuration port before getting deployed into the field you will need to deal with the logistics of getting the units from your warehouse via your desk, packing and unpacking, and clearly marking them so that the right unit goes into the right location.


Submitted by fredrik.nyman on Thu, 03/21/2019 - 09:51

I love acronyms. You got three of them in the title of this post.

In recent years we got Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV). Many of the large telcos have invested millions into research of these subjects and are pushing the industry in this direction. Telefonica has expressed high ambitions to move to a completely SDN/NFV enabled network in record time. All the big ones are involved.

Keeping product lines around

Submitted by fredrik.nyman on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 09:50

Building fibre to the home networks are different from any traditional enterprise or telecommunications network. One of the main differences is the time it takes to complete the network. You make a plan, design a an architecture with VLANs and redundancy and imagine how this will scale as the number of connected customers increase. But then the years go by, because building a fibre network to connect every home in the community can take decades.

Save the planet - work from home

Submitted by fredrik.nyman on Thu, 03/07/2019 - 10:30

In my last post i revealed how dirty a fiber network can be depending on the source of electricity powering the network. I showed how a typcial 24-port access switch might contribute anything between 23kg to 485kg of carbon dioxide per year to the atmosphere depending on the electricity mix and how that can be reduced with lowpower optical modules.